Education turns 180 degrees in a matter of months | New Hampshire

If you doubt elections have consequences, just look up the bills before the House Education Committee this week.

Only yesterday, actually it was December, the Commission to Study School Funding released its final report after a year’s work studying the current funding system and proposing a major overhaul of how state education aid is determined, although committee members declined to embrace a new method to make the system more equitable.

While some of the commission’s recommendations will come before the Legislature this year, the heart of the group’s final report will not.

Instead, lawmakers Tuesday will hold a public hearing on House Bill 20, the Richard “Dick” Hinch education freedom account program, or the latest version of a school voucher bill that opponents say is the most far-reaching and costly voucher program in the country.

The sponsors of the bill include the House Speaker and Senate President, the House and Senate majority leaders, and the House and Senate chairs and vice chairs of the two education committees.

If that is not enough firepower to guarantee passage, Gov. Chris Sununu and Department of Education Commissioner Frank Edelblut both support education vouchers.

Edelblut recently did a financial analysis indicating the cost to state and local property taxpayers to be minimal.

The bill currently does not have a fiscal note as the Legislative Budget Assistant waits for additional information from the Department of Education to be able to calculate the cost.

The state currently has a voucher or scholarship program for low- to moderate-income families funded essentially through business tax credits for companies and interest and dividends tax credits for individuals.

The amount of annual credit for the program is limited to no more than $1 million a year, while opponents believe the freedom account bill would involve substantially more than $1 million.

“Our communities are struggling under an inequitable funding system which will culminate in an $89 million cut in state funding next year,” said Christina Pretorius, Policy Director at Reaching Higher NH, a bipartisan organization seeking to improve public education in the state. “However, lawmakers have stated that one of their top priorities this session is to enact the most far-reaching voucher program in the country.”

Unlike the current voucher program, the freedom accounts would be open to nearly all parents with children in traditional public and charter schools, as well as in private schools. It is unclear if it is open to parents who are currently homeschooling their children.

Parents and students would receive between about $4,500 to $8,500 per pupil to spend on tuition to any private, religious or alternative school and on other related educational costs including homeschooling, computers, books, etc.

A provision of the bill makes it abundantly clear there are no restrictions on the types of schools where the money could be spent.

The bill states:

“Nothing in this chapter shall be deemed to limit the independence or autonomy of an education service provider or to make the actions of an education service provider the actions of the state government.

II. Education service providers shall be given maximum freedom to provide for the educational needs of EFA students without governmental control.

III. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to expand the regulatory authority of the state, its officers, or any school district to impose any additional regulation of education service providers beyond those necessary to enforce the requirements of the EFA program.

IV. An education service provider that accepts payment from an EFA pursuant to this chapter is not an agent of the state or federal government.

V. No education service provider shall be required to alter its creed, practices, admissions policy or curriculum in order to accept payments from an EFA.”

In other words, the schools do not have to follow state or federal education regulations, guidelines or standards including special education rules and laws because they would essentially be private or non-governmental organizations or providers.

The bill is similar to one proposed in 2017 that was eventually defeated in the House in 2018 after it was retained for additional work.

In his analysis of this year’s bill, Edelblut claims it will save state taxpayers about $360 million to $390 million over 10 years by lowering public school costs as students leave for other educational alternatives.

He touted the program in light of the pandemic and its effect on children.

“Through this pandemic, we have seen tremendous demand for educational options as families searched for instructional models that met the needs of their children and families,” Edelblut said in a press release on his analysis. “Some of those families were driven based on finding an environment where their children could thrive educationally and others were more focused on the need to get back to work. The EFA education program will provide much more flexibility and create many more options to those families while at the same time providing some relief to taxpayers who also have felt the strain of the pandemic.”

But others see it differently.

“A question that I think our state leaders should ask is, what kind of state do we want 5, 10, 15 years from now? Will this program help to strengthen our state, our economy, and prepare our students — current and future — for life in the 21st century?” Pretorius said. “This proposal, along with the funding crisis, presents a reckoning for our state, that I think we all need to grapple with.”

Commission Report

The education funding study proposed changing the system to fund students instead of institutions the architects of the study told reporters after they released the final report.

The commission’s work would redefine an adequate education and its cost and revamp the state’s education aid distribution system.

The study was approved in the two-year budget package approved in the fall of 2019 in an attempt to address the growing inequities in the state funding system that has sent property taxes skyrocketing in property-poor communities, while having little effect on the tax rates in property wealthy communities.

The inequities between property-wealthy and property-poor communities and how they affect public education is why Claremont and four other property-poor communities successfully sued the state over two decades ago.

So the commission first decided to change how the state determines an adequate education and its costs.

A study done by the commission’s consultants, The American Institutes for Research, used student data to prove students in poorer school districts had lower educational outcomes than students with more opportunities from wealthier districts.

The commission decided to base adequate education on the state’s average student outcomes, using achievement scores, attendance and graduation rates.

The new distribution aid system would provide enough money to property-poor school districts to give students the opportunity to achieve the average state outcomes.

The distribution system would be based on the needs of students in a district and the community’s or communities’ characteristics.

The consultants proposed several solutions that all used a statewide property tax paid to the state and redistributed to help poorer school districts.

The statewide property tax has been controversial and donor towns successfully sued the state over its use 20 years ago.

The committee fearing a backlash did not endorse a statewide property tax as the most equitable method to provide an adequate education for the state’s children.

The basics of the study have not been proposed as bills this session, but may be in the future.

However, instead of focusing on adequacy and equitable funding, the focus this session will be on allowing parents and students to attend schools outside the public education system by drawing from the pool of education aid money to pay for “educational freedom.”

The House killed a voucher program three years ago, but this year it appears the skids have been greased for a straight shot to the governor’s desk and his signature.

The public hearing on HB 20 begins at 1:15 p.m. Tuesday before the House Education Committee.

The hearing will be held remotely for the public at zoom.us/j/99800820017, or by telephone at 1-929-205-6099. The ID is 998 0082 0017.

Garry Rayno may be reached at garry.rayno@yahoo.com.

Source Article